Skip to main content

Tenet

I’ve decided to do the unthinkable and write about Tenet. Christopher Nolan is one of my favorite directors and there’s no movie he directs that I wouldn’t watch. He has a reputation for putting out complex and mind-boggling movies like Inception and Interstellar and honestly, understanding his movies kind of makes me feel smart.

That being said, I have seen Tenet 3 times and I can say that I did not understand shit. I’m not even angry because it’s okay. Robert Pattison apparently did not understand what was going on while filming so that’s quite comforting to me. There’s a reason I failed Physics in school.

Hold up, it’s not that deep yo! Hi Everyone, Yimika here (an intelligent friend who knows more about Physics even though this knowledge is not really useful for this review) who's decided to help Aby with this movie. I should say first that Christopher Nolan, who I’ve only recently been able to identify in a solo picture, did an AMAZING job with this movie in that it really grabs your attention and you wouldn’t want to miss a thing. However, being glued is the exact thing that could confuse you as some of the detail is quite unnecessary in the grand scheme of the movie.

On a high-level, this is every apocalyptic movie (somewhere here, Aby and I argued about whether this is really an apocalyptic movie but if she knew so much, I wouldn’t be here) which has the added complexity of your typical time-travel movie, like Avengers: Endgame where Thanos was trying to reduce the population of earth because earthlings (you and I) are a nuisance and our actions now will create chaos in the future — seriously, let’s be smart about how we use this planet.

So all that’s happened in Tenet is, the future has sent people back in time to come save impending doom in the present, doom that was also initiated in the future. As for all the moving backward? It’s simply showing what happens as people are travelling back. In most other time-travel movies, all you see is someone go into a machine and come out in their desired moment. However, in Tenet, you get to see the person literally move backward, experiencing the things that already happened but in reverse, until they can find a machine that inverts them to move forward again. Being that this is a review, there’s no need to go over the intricacies but you can read this very detailed explanation or watch the movie again with this new knowledge (I recommend this option). Anyway, back to Aby now…

I’ll talk about the actors now, thank you very much oh intelligent one. I think Robert Pattinson is underrated as an actor. His roles are so diverse and he amazes me every time I watch him on screen. For someone who practically had no idea what was going on while filming, he did a great job.

This was the first movie I saw John David Washington and I was really impressed with his acting, considering the nature of his role and the lack of precedence. I thought he was too uptight at some point but to be fair, he was facing the end of the world.

Kenneth Branagh is one person who’s had huge success both as an actor and a director. His role as the villain/antagonist is so captivating especially with the Russian accent. I think by now we can all agree that the Russian accent is the villain accent. Side note — I didn’t realize how short he was until I saw him here. He’s really very close to the ground.

This is actually a brilliant movie when you think about the production and special effects. It won the award for Best Visual effects at the 2021 Oscars and I assure you it was well deserved. Christopher Nolan can do no wrong in my eyes and I’m always looking forward to his next project.

I’ll rate this movie 7.5 out of 10.

Comments

  1. Hahaha.. Fun stuff, weldone! Looking forward to more reviews

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trial of the Chicago 7

I had been hesitant to see this film since it came out because I thought it was going to be one of those movies that was boring and typically portrayed black people as victims/slaves, because I'm honestly tired of all that but then someone convinced me otherwise and well it was so damn worth it. An historical legal drama, this movie takes us through the trial of activists;  Abbie Hoffman , Tom Hayden , Rennie Davis , Jerry Rubin , David Dellinger , Lee Weiner and John Froines , after the American government charged them with conspiracy to incite violence across state lines at the Democratic National Convention (DNC) in 1968. Originally called the Chicago 8 because Bobby Seale , the national leader of the Black Panther party was one of the defendants but was eventually given a mistrial during the trial.  In 1968, the DNC is about to take place in Chicago where the presidential candidate for the next election was going to be nominated. The President at the time, Lyndon B. Johnson h

Cruella

I was not exactly excited to see this movie as the last major film released by Disney ( Mulan ) ended in tears. Nevertheless, I went ahead to see it and I was not disappointed.  Set in the 70s, Cruella is a girl whose dreams of being a fashion designer come true after she redesigned a dress for the Baroness, one of the big names in the fashion industry at the time. She ends up working for her until she finds out that she's a narcissistic bitch who would do anything to remain in power. Kind of like the Nigerian government. This movie gave me The Devil wears Prada vibes, but less enjoyable. Cruella is based on the novel The Hundred and One Dalmatians by Dodie Smith in which she steals dalmatian dogs in order to make fur coats with their skin. I think this is supposed to be a prequel of sorts as it tells of the origins of Cruella. The idea of trying to create a backstory as to why a villain turned out the way they did is honestly getting tiring. I'd be much happier knowing that

Wrath of Man

As a huge action movie fan, it is my responsibility to watch every blockbuster action film that gets released. Action and horror movies tend to keep me on the edge of my seat and that's a feeling I wouldn't pass up for anything. Guy Ritchie , the director is known for his great storytelling and we see this in some of his previous movies like Sherlock Holmes and The Man from UNCLE . Wrath of Man did not have a great story line, but like his other movies, he keeps you on the edge of your seat with the suspense, thrill and intensity. It had the typical Guy Ritchie signature: the timelines and the sound effect. Basically, Jason Statham plays a man who is trying to avenge the death of his son. That's literally it. Fun fact, Jason Statham made his acting debut in Guy Ritchie's film and they have gone on to collaborate 3 times after that, this being the fourth. I thought the movie was unnecessarily long. There were some scenes that I don't think deserved much detail. Mos